Alice Rame vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 11:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Rame vs N. Hibino

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rame 1 - 0 Hibino
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alice Rame winning 2 and Nao Hibino winning 0. The last match between Alice Rame and Nao Hibino was at the W75 Bucharest, 01-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Alice Rame getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rame | 1 |
| Hibino | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Bucharest(07-01-25)
A. Rame vs N. Hibino H2H Profile
A. Rame vs N. Hibino Match Preview:
- Recent second serve stats indicate Hibino has the edge, winning 41.31% of points compared to Rame's 36.5%. Does this suggest Hibino has a better serve under pressure? Yes, possibly.
- In return games over the last six months, Hibino has a slight advantage on opponents' second serves, winning 50.36% of points, while Rame wins 48.32%.
- Concerning first serve returns, Rame slightly outperforms Hibino with a 35.3% win rate versus Hibino's 34.34%.
- Under pressure, Hibino excels in saving breakpoints with a 53.5% success rate, compared to Rame's 44.53%.
- Over the past year, Rame has a stronger overall match win percentage at 65.91%, while Hibino's stands at 48.15%.
- Rame's preferred surface is clay with a 62% win rate, whereas Hibino performs best on hard courts with a 57% win rate.
- Rame frequently competes in Challenger and ITF events boasting a win rate of 65.48%, whereas Hibino focuses on the main tour, achieving a 50% win rate.
- When examining opponent caliber, Hibino faces tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 172.15, in contrast to Rame's 357.13.
- In deciding sets, Rame shows superior performance, winning 75% compared to Hibino's 67% success rate.
- Rame's breakpoint conversion rate is stronger at 46.15%, outweighing Hibino's 36.27% in recent form.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
Both players have their distinct strengths, but certain stats provide indicators of potential outcomes for the upcoming match.
Rame holds an overall higher win percentage over the past year and dominates in deciding sets, which could be crucial in tightly contested games.
Hibino, however, faces more competitive opponents regularly and demonstrates superior second serve performance and break point saving ability, which are critical under match pressure.
Considering Hibino's superior stats on tougher competition and Rame's weaknesses on fast hard surfaces, Hibino is slightly favored to win this encounter.
Alice Rame vs Nao Hibino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Rame vs N. Hibino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:35:55 | Average Match Time | 1:35:55 |
| 51% (27/53) | 1st Serve % | 58% (39/67) |
| 67% (18/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (25/39) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 51% (34/67) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Rame Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | L | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | ||
F | W | 7-5 7-6(2) | ||
SF | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||

A. Rame vs N. Hibino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.81% (378/254) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.44% (405/339) |
| 58.33% (826/590) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.93% (903/803) |
| 54.35% (6911/5805) | Games Win/Loss | 51.50% (8023/7555) |
| 56.25% (45/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.64% (290/222) |
| 61.62% (305/190) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (55/66) |
| 49.12% (28/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 51.52% (34/32) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 362 | Aces Total | 1016 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1247 | Total Double Faults | 1602 |
| 1:26:4 | Average Match Time | 1:12:45 |
| 486.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.65 |
| 66% (21707/32893) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25642/39277) |
| 58% (12633/21707) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (15531/25642) |
| 45% (5057/11186) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6318/13632) |
| 52% (2432/4713) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2277/4794) |
| 49% (16580/33703) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17671/39513) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 47.56% (39/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 42.42% (28/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 48.82% (103/108) |
| 57.18% (251/188) | Challenger W/L | 59.41% (202/138) |
| 66.15% (127/65) | Futures W/L | 82.76% (24/5) |
| 60% (369/615) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (398/732) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 49% (48/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (87/152) |
| 52% (86/165) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (125/222) |
| 87% (374/327) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (382/329) |
| 12% (374/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (382/51) |
| 18% (257/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (362/73) |